Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Featured Image

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a cornerstone of workplace equality. It prohibits employers from discriminating against employees and job applicants based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), and national origin. This protection extends throughout all aspects of employment, from the hiring process and promotions to how employees are treated on the job.

Discrimination can be overt, like refusing to hire someone because of their religion. However, Title VII also prohibits more nuanced forms of bias. This includes seemingly neutral policies that have a discriminatory effect. For instance, a company might require all employees to lift a specific amount of weight, even though this disproportionately excludes female applicants. Title VII also encompasses two types of harassment: quid pro quo and hostile work environment.

Quid pro quo harassment occurs when submission to unwelcome sexual advances is made a condition of employment or when rejection of such advances leads to negative job consequences. A hostile work environment is created when unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic (like race or sex) is severe or pervasive enough to interfere with an employee’s work performance or create a hostile, intimidating, or offensive work environment.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against at work, you can file a charge with the EEOC. They will investigate your claim and attempt to settle it with your employer. If that fails, you may have the right to sue in federal court.


II. History and Importance

A. Historical Context of Employment Discrimination in the US

The history of the United States is deeply intertwined with the struggle for equal opportunity, particularly in employment. For centuries, discriminatory practices based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin permeated the American workplace.

  • Pre-Civil War Era: Enslavement and the subsequent Jim Crow laws in the South effectively denied opportunities for Black Americans.
  • Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries: Immigration fueled the Industrial Revolution and led to discrimination against various ethnic groups seeking jobs.
  • Gender Discrimination: Women faced significant barriers, often relegated to lower-paying and less prestigious jobs compared to men, even with comparable qualifications.

1. Discriminatory Practices:

These included:

  • Hiring practices: Overt exclusion of certain racial or ethnic groups from job opportunities through word-of-mouth recruitment or discriminatory advertisements.
  • Segregated workplaces: Enforcing racial or gender divisions within companies, limiting opportunities for advancement.
  • Unequal pay: Paying women or minorities less for the same work performed by white men.
  • Religious discrimination: Disfavoring applicants due to their religious beliefs or practices.

2. Consequences:

These discriminatory practices not only denied individuals a chance to earn a living and contribute to society but also perpetuated a system of social and economic inequality.

B. The Civil Rights Act of 1964: An Overview

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands as a landmark piece of legislation in American history, dismantling the legal foundation for segregation and discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in various aspects of life, including public accommodations, education, and most importantly, employment.

1. Key Provisions of the Act:

  • Title II: Prohibits discrimination in public accommodations (restaurants, hotels, etc.)
  • Title III: Bans discrimination in public spaces and services.
  • Title IV: Ensures desegregation in public schools.
  • Title V: Strengthens voting rights protections.
  • Title VI: Prohibits discrimination in programs receiving federal financial assistance.
  • Title VII: Focuses on employment discrimination, prohibiting unfair practices based on protected characteristics.

C. Significance of Title VII

Title VII represents a cornerstone of legal protection against workplace discrimination in the US. Its passage marked a turning point in ensuring equal opportunity for all individuals to participate in the workforce based on merit and qualifications, not their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

1. Impact on American Society:

Title VII has significantly impacted American society by:

  • Promoting diversity and inclusion: Creating a more diverse workforce that reflects the nation’s demographics.
  • Leveling the playing field: Providing a legal framework to challenge discriminatory practices and hold employers accountable.
  • Strengthening the economy: Allowing businesses to tap into a wider talent pool, fostering innovation and growth.

However, the fight for equal opportunity continues, as we will explore in the following sections.


III. Protected Classes and Prohibited Practices

Title VII establishes a legal framework protecting individuals from discrimination in employment based on specific characteristics. Let’s delve deeper into these protected classes and the prohibited discriminatory practices.

A. Race, Color, Religion, Sex (including Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation), and National Origin: Defining the Protected Classes

Title VII safeguards individuals belonging to the following protected classes:

  • Race: Refers to a person’s self-identified race or racial group (e.g., Black, White, Asian, Native American).
  • Color: Encompasses a person’s skin tone and hair texture, protecting against discrimination based on these physical characteristics.
  • Religion: Covers all sincerely held religious beliefs and practices. Employers must accommodate reasonable religious practices unless they create undue hardship on the business.
  • Sex: Includes discrimination based on a person’s sex assigned at birth (male or female) or their gender identity (how they identify themselves). Title VII also prohibits discrimination based on pregnancy. The Supreme Court has extended Title VII’s protection to include sexual orientation.
  • National Origin: Protects individuals from discrimination based on their country of origin, ancestry, or ethnic background. This includes discrimination against individuals with accents or speaking a different language.

B. Discrimination in Employment Decisions: Hiring, Firing, Promotions, Compensation, etc.

Title VII prohibits discrimination in all aspects of employment, including:

  • Recruitment and Hiring: Employers cannot favor or disfavor applicants based on their protected class. This includes using discriminatory language in job postings or filtering out candidates based on their names or perceived race/ethnicity.
  • Promotions and Transfers: Decisions regarding promotions, transfers, or other opportunities for advancement must be based on merit and qualifications, not an employee’s protected class.
  • Compensation and Benefits: Employers cannot offer unequal pay or benefits based on an employee’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes salary, bonuses, healthcare coverage, and other perks.
  • Training and Development: Employees in all protected classes must have equal access to training and development opportunities crucial for career advancement.
  • Discipline and Termination: Employers cannot target employees for discipline or termination because of their protected class. Decisions must be based on legitimate work-related reasons.

C. Harassment: A Form of Sex Discrimination under Title VII

Title VII recognizes that a hostile work environment created by unwelcome sexual advances, offensive remarks about a person’s sex, or other conduct based on sex can be a form of discrimination. This applies to both same-sex and opposite-sex harassment. To be actionable harassment, it must be:

  • Severe or pervasive: The behavior must be sufficiently severe or occur repeatedly to create a hostile or abusive work environment.
  • Unwelcome: The employee must communicate that the conduct is unwelcome.

Examples of harassment: Unwanted sexual advances, offensive jokes or comments about a person’s sex or gender identity, unwelcome physical contact, and creating a hostile work environment based on a person’s sex.

Also, read:


IV. Key Provisions of Title VII

The Civil Rights Act and Employment Discrimination

Title VII establishes a framework for achieving equal employment opportunity (EEO) by outlining specific requirements and defenses employers can raise in discrimination claims.

A. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Requirement

The core principle of Title VII is that employers must provide equal employment opportunity (EEO) to all qualified individuals, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This means employers must:

  • Develop and implement non-discriminatory policies: These policies should cover all aspects of employment, from recruitment and hiring to promotions, compensation, and termination.
  • Take affirmative steps to promote EEO: This could include diversity training for employees and managers, outreach programs to attract qualified candidates from diverse backgrounds, and setting goals for increasing diversity within the workforce.
  • Maintain records of employment decisions: Documentation helps employers demonstrate that their decisions were made based on legitimate, non-discriminatory factors.

Related articles:

B. Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) Defense

Title VII recognizes a limited exception called the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ) defense. This allows employers to consider an applicant’s religion, sex, or national origin as a job requirement. Still, only if it is a bona fide (genuine) business necessity and there is no reasonable alternative way to perform the job.

1. Strict Requirements:

The BFOQ defense is narrowly interpreted. Employers must demonstrate that the protected characteristic is:

  • Essential to the job: It must be directly related to the job duties and not simply a preference.
  • Business necessity: A legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the essential characteristic must exist.

2. Examples of BFOQ:

  • The actor is required to be a specific gender for a role.
  • Foreign language fluency is required for a customer service position.

BFOQ cannot be used to justify:

  • Gender-based pay differences for the same work.
  • Refusal to hire someone based on stereotypes about their protected class.

C. Disparate Treatment vs. Disparate Impact: Understanding Different Forms of Discrimination

1. Title VII addresses two main types of discrimination:

  • Disparate Treatment: Occurs when an employer intentionally treats an employee less favorably because of their protected class. This can be proven by showing the employer treated similarly situated employees from different protected classes differently.
  • Disparate Impact: Occurs when a seemingly neutral policy or practice has a discriminatory effect on a protected class, even if it was not intended to be discriminatory. For example, a height requirement may disqualify female applicants.

2. Burden of Proof:

  • Disparate Treatment: Employees are typically burdened to prove they were discriminated against.
  • Disparate Impact: The employer might have to justify the policy or practice if it discriminates against a protected class.

Understanding these key provisions allows employees and employers to navigate their rights and responsibilities under Title VII.

Also, read:


V. The Road to Passage

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

The passage of Title VII in 1964 wasn’t an isolated event. It culminated from a long struggle for racial equality in the United States, with key players and legislative battles paving the way.

A. The Long Fight for Racial Equality: Precursors to Title VII

Decades of activism and legal challenges laid the groundwork for Title VII:

  • Reconstruction Era Amendments (1865-1877): The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection under the law, and granted Black men the right to vote. However, enforcement of these amendments weakened after Reconstruction.
  • Early 20th Century Labor Organizing: Labor unions, particularly those led by African Americans, fought for fair treatment and equal opportunity in the workplace. The Pullman-Porter Strike of 1920, led by A. Philip Randolph, highlighted the economic power of Black workers.
  • Executive Orders: President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Executive Order 8802 in 1941 prohibited discrimination in defense industries during World War II. This paved the way for increased Black participation in the workforce.
  • Brown v. Board of Education (1954): This landmark Supreme Court case outlawed racial segregation in public schools, marking a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement.

B. Legislative Battles: The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Compromise for Title VII

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was comprehensive legislation addressing multiple aspects of racial discrimination. However, the fight for its passage, particularly Title VII, was fraught with political battles and compromises.

  • Early Proposals: Early drafts of the Civil Rights Act focused primarily on ending segregation in public accommodations and voting rights. However, President John F. Kennedy pushed for a more comprehensive bill, including a fair employment provision.
  • Southern Opposition: Southern Democrats, who held significant power in Congress, vehemently opposed provisions banning racial discrimination in employment. They feared it would disrupt the Southern economy, which was heavily reliant on segregated workplaces.
  • The Compromise: A crucial compromise was reached. Northern liberals agreed to weaken the enforcement provisions of Title VII to secure Southern support for the broader Civil Rights Act. This compromise limited the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) enforcement powers and allowed jury trials in discrimination cases, which were historically unfavorable to plaintiffs.

C. Key Players and Organizations in the Passage of Title VII

Several individuals and organizations played critical roles in securing Title VII’s passage:

  • President John F. Kennedy: He championed a comprehensive civil rights bill, including fair employment provisions.
  • Civil Rights Leaders: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., A. Philip Randolph, and other leaders mobilized public support for the Civil Rights Act.
  • Labor Unions: Unions, including the NAACP and the National Urban League, advocated for fair employment practices.
  • Business Leaders: A coalition of business leaders recognized the economic benefits of a diverse workforce and supported Title VII.

Despite compromises, the passage of Title VII marked a significant victory in the fight for racial equality in employment.

Also, read:


VI. Enforcement of Title VII

Title VII established a framework for enforcing its provisions, empowering individuals to challenge workplace discrimination. Let’s delve into the key institutions and processes involved.

A. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is the primary federal agency that enforces Title VII and other federal employment discrimination laws.

1. Responsibilities:

  • Enforce Title VII by investigating charges of discrimination.
  • Mediate disputes between employees and employers.
  • Provide technical assistance to employers and employees on their rights and responsibilities under Title VII.
  • Issue guidance and interpretations of Title VII.

2. Limitations:

The EEOC cannot directly penalize employers for discrimination. However, it can file lawsuits in court on behalf of aggrieved employees.

B. Filing a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC

Individuals who believe they have been discriminated against in employment based on their race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity and sexual orientation), or national origin can file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC.

  • Time Limits: Generally, there are strict time limits for filing a charge with the EEOC, typically 180 days after the alleged discrimination occurred.
  • EEOC Investigation: The EEOC will investigate the charge, gather evidence, and attempt to conciliate between the employee and employer.
  • Right to Sue Letter: If the EEOC cannot resolve the charge through conciliation, they will issue a “right to sue” letter, allowing the employee to file a lawsuit in federal court.

C. Litigation Process under Title VII

Employees may pursue a lawsuit in federal court if the EEOC cannot resolve the discrimination claim through conciliation. This process can be complex and involves several stages:

  • Pre-trial Discovery: Both parties gather evidence through depositions, requests for documents, and witness interviews.
  • Motions and Summary Judgment: Either party may file motions to dismiss the case or for summary judgment if they believe there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute.
  • Trial: If the case goes to trial, the employee must present evidence to prove they were discriminated against. The employer can then present a defense.
  • Damages: If successful, the employee may be awarded various forms of relief, including back pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages for emotional distress, and punitive damages (in rare cases).

1. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR):

Sometimes, employees and employers may resolve their disputes through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like mediation or arbitration. These processes can be faster and less expensive than litigation.

2. Importance of Legal Representation:

Navigating the legal process for filing a charge or lawsuit under Title VII can be complex. Individuals should consult with an attorney specializing in employment law.

Also, read:


VII. Landmark Supreme Court Cases and their Impact on Title VII

Landmark Supreme Court decisions have significantly shaped Title VII’s interpretation and application. Let’s explore how these cases have expanded protections for employees.

A. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971): Establishing Disparate Impact Theory

1. Facts:

Black employees at Duke Power Company challenged a requirement of high school diplomas and standardized test scores for hiring and promotions, arguing it had a disparate impact on Black applicants who may not have had equal educational opportunities.

2. Holding:

The Supreme Court established the disparate impact theory under Title VII. This theory allows employees to challenge seemingly neutral employment practices that have a discriminatory effect on a protected class, even if there was no intent to discriminate.

3. Impact:

This case broadened the scope of Title VII beyond intentional discrimination. Employers now need to consider the impact of their policies on protected classes.

B. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (1986): Defining Sexual Harassment under Title VII

1. Facts:

Michelle Vinson, a bank teller, sued Meritor Savings Bank for sexual harassment by her supervisor. The bank argued sexual harassment did not fall under Title VII’s definition of sex discrimination.

2. Holding:

The Supreme Court held that unwelcome sexual advances that create a hostile work environment can constitute sex discrimination under Title VII.

3. Impact:

This case clarified that sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination and expanded protections for employees facing a hostile work environment based on their sex.

C. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989): Gender Stereotypes and Employment Decisions

1. Facts:

Ann Hopkins, a senior manager at Price Waterhouse, was passed over for partnership. Her colleagues cited her failure to conform to traditional feminine stereotypes, such as being too aggressive, as a reason for not promoting her.

2. Holding:

The Supreme Court ruled that employers cannot base employment decisions on gender stereotypes. Title VII prohibits discrimination against both men and women for not conforming to traditional gender expectations in their appearance or behavior.

3. Impact:

This case challenged gender bias in the workplace and emphasized that employers must evaluate employees based on their qualifications and merit, not on stereotypes about how men and women are supposed to act. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins marked a significant step forward in promoting gender equality in the workplace.


VIII. Challenges and Debates

Despite the progress made under Title VII, enforcing equal opportunity in the workplace remains a complex issue with ongoing debates.

A. Affirmative Action: Balancing Diversity with Merit

Affirmative action policies aim to level the playing field for historically disadvantaged groups by encouraging their inclusion in hiring, promotions, and educational opportunities. However, affirmative action remains a source of controversy, with legal complexities varying depending on the context.

  • Supporters: Argue that affirmative action is necessary to address past discrimination and create a more diverse workforce that reflects the nation’s demographics. It can also benefit businesses by fostering innovation and creativity.
  • Opponents: Argue that affirmative action can discriminate against more qualified candidates based on race or ethnicity. They believe the best person for the job should be chosen regardless of background.

Legal Considerations:

  • Public vs. Private Sector: Affirmative action programs in public institutions (like universities) have a stronger legal basis to consider race or ethnicity in admissions or hiring decisions to achieve diversity.
  • Private Businesses: Private businesses have more limitations. While they can utilize affirmative action goals to encourage diversity, their programs cannot use quotas or preferences that directly disadvantage more qualified candidates from any racial or ethnic group.

Finding the Balance: Debates continue on how to achieve diversity goals while ensuring fairness and merit-based selection. Legal challenges continue to refine the boundaries of acceptable affirmative action programs.

B. Religious Accommodation in the Workplace

Title VII requires employers to accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs unless it creates undue hardship on the business. However, balancing religious accommodation with business needs can be challenging, and real-world situations can be more intricate than the basic framework suggests.

  • Employee Rights: Employees can request reasonable accommodations for religious practices, such as flexible scheduling or modified dress codes. However, these requests need to be sincerely held religious beliefs, not mere preferences.
  • Employer Concerns: Employers need to ensure these accommodations do not disrupt workflow, place undue burden on other employees, or compromise safety. In such cases, employers can engage in an interactive process to explore alternative accommodations that address both the employee’s needs and the business’s concerns.

Navigating this Issue: Ongoing dialogue and clear communication between employers and employees are crucial for finding solutions that respect religious beliefs while maintaining business functionality. If an agreement cannot be reached, the EEOC can provide guidance and mediation services.

C. Unconscious Bias and its Implications for Title VII

Unconscious bias refers to implicit stereotypes and prejudices that can influence decision-making without conscious awareness. This bias can affect workplace discrimination even if employers lack explicit intent.

  • Challenges: Unconscious bias is complex because it often operates outside our conscious awareness. It can be not easy to identify and address.
  • Implications for Title VII: Proving discrimination based on unconscious bias can be challenging under Title VII. However, employers can take steps to mitigate unconscious bias through diversity training and inclusive hiring practices.

IX. International Impact of Title VII

National Origin Discrimination under Title VII

Title VII’s legacy extends beyond the borders of the United States. It has served as a model for anti-discrimination legislation and inspired efforts to promote workplace equality worldwide.

A. Influence on Anti-discrimination Laws Around the World

The passage of Title VII in 1964 marked a significant shift towards legal protections against discrimination in employment. Many countries have looked to Title VII as a starting point for developing their anti-discrimination laws:

  • Europe: The European Union (EU) has adopted directives prohibiting discrimination based on race, sex, religion, and disability. These directives have influenced national anti-discrimination laws in EU member states.
  • Latin America: Several Latin American countries, including Brazil and Argentina, have enacted anti-discrimination laws inspired by Title VII.
  • Asia: Countries like India and South Korea have also implemented legislation prohibiting employment discrimination based on various protected characteristics.

While the scope and specifics of these laws vary by country, Title VII’s core principles of equal opportunity and non-discrimination have had a global impact.

B. Global Efforts to Promote Workplace Equality

Beyond individual national laws, international organizations play a vital role in promoting workplace equality:

  • International Labour Organization (ILO): The ILO, a specialized agency of the United Nations, sets international labor standards and promotes decent work for all. It has adopted conventions and protocols addressing discrimination in employment.
  • Multilateral Trade Agreements: Some trade agreements include provisions promoting labor rights and non-discrimination in the workplace. These agreements can encourage countries to adopt stronger anti-discrimination measures.

Challenges Remain:  Despite these efforts, significant work remains to ensure equal opportunity in workplaces worldwide. Cultural differences, varying levels of enforcement mechanisms, and the informal sector pose challenges to achieving truly global workplace equality.


X. The Future of Title VII

Artificial Intelligence: The Robots Are Now Hiring | Moving Upstream

Title VII remains a cornerstone of workplace equality in the US. Still, the evolving nature of work necessitates continual examination and adaptation. Let’s explore emerging issues, legislative proposals, and the enduring importance of Title VII.

A. Emerging Issues and Technological Challenges

The workplace is constantly changing, presenting new challenges for applying Title VII:

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Hiring: AI algorithms used in recruitment and hiring raise concerns about potential bias against certain groups.
  • Remote Work and the Gig Economy: The rise of remote work and the gig economy creates new complexities in enforcing Title VII protections for these workers.
  • Workplace Surveillance: Increased use of technology to monitor employees raises privacy concerns and potential misuse for discriminatory purposes.

Addressing these challenges will require ongoing dialogue, legal interpretations, and potential legislative updates to ensure Title VII remains relevant in the evolving workplace.

B. Legislative Proposals for Strengthening Title VII Protections

Several legislative proposals aim to strengthen Title VII protections in response to emerging issues:

  • The Paycheck Fairness Act: would address the gender pay gap by making it easier for employees to challenge unequal pay.
  • The Equality Act: Would expand Title VII’s protections to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
  • The Ending Forced Arbitration Act: Would allow employees to pursue claims of discrimination in court rather than being forced into arbitration, which can be less favorable to employees.

The success of these proposals remains to be seen. Still, they highlight the ongoing efforts to adapt Title VII to address contemporary workplace issues.

Related article:

C. Continued Importance of Title VII in a Changing Workplace

Despite facing new challenges, Title VII remains essential for promoting workplace equality:

  • Foundation for Anti-discrimination Law: It is a legal foundation for challenging discrimination and holding employers accountable.
  • Provides Framework for Diversity and Inclusion: Title VII encourages diversity and inclusion within the workforce by promoting equal opportunity, which can benefit businesses through innovation and creativity.
  • Basis for Future Legislation: Title VII provides a framework for developing new laws and regulations to address emerging challenges as the workplace evolves.

Title VII’s legacy of promoting equal opportunity in the workplace endures. By adapting to new challenges and continuing the fight against workplace discrimination, Title VII will remain vital for creating a more just and equitable work environment for all.


XI. Conclusion

A. Lasting Legacy of Title VII for Workplace Equality

Title VII’s passage in 1964 marked a watershed moment, dismantling legal barriers to equal employment opportunities. It has:

  • Empowered Individuals: Provided legal recourse for employees facing discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity and sexual orientation), and national origin.
  • Promoted Diversity and Inclusion: Encouraged a more diverse workforce, fostering innovation and a fairer workplace environment.
  • Inspired Global Action: Served as a model for anti-discrimination legislation worldwide.

B. Ongoing Efforts to Ensure a Level Playing Field for All

Despite progress, the fight for workplace equality continues:

  • Emerging Issues: Technological advancements and changing work structures present new challenges for enforcing Title VII.
  • Legislative Proposals: Efforts are underway to strengthen Title VII protections to address contemporary issues like the gender pay gap and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
  • Importance of Enforcement: Continued vigilance is crucial to ensure effective enforcement of Title VII and hold employers accountable.

C. Looking Ahead: Title VII and the Future of Work

As the workplace continues to evolve, Title VII will need to adapt to remain relevant:

  • Dialogue and Innovation: Ongoing discussions on emerging issues like AI in hiring and remote work are necessary to ensure fair application of Title VII principles.
  • Modernization: Potential legislative updates may be necessary to address new forms of discrimination and strengthen enforcement mechanisms.
  • Enduring Significance: Title VII’s core principles of equal opportunity and non-discrimination will remain vital in shaping a future of work that is fair and inclusive for all.

Title VII’s legacy lives on as a cornerstone of workplace equality. By adapting to the changing work landscape and maintaining the fight against discrimination, Title VII will continue to pave the way for a more just and equitable work environment for future generations.


XII. Citation

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (n.d.). US EEOC. https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964


Junaid Khan

Junaid Khan JD/MBA (Human Resources Management) is an expert on harassment laws since 2009. He is a passionate advocate for victims of harassment and works to educate the public about harassment laws and prevention. He is also a sought-after speaker on human resource management, relationships, parenting, and the importance of respecting others.

Junaid Khan has 224 posts and counting. See all posts by Junaid Khan

Avatar of Junaid Khan